Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:19:58 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: small@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "nanobsd" prototype Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403111213470.87340-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <53045.1079035854@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403111202000.87340-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju > lian Elischer writes: > > > > > >On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > >> > >[...] > >> mkdir /usr/src/nanobsd > >[...] > >> > >> Feedback of all sorts most welcome! And more documentation > >> to arrive as it gets written. > > > >wouldn't it make sense to put nanoBSD in release alongside picoBSD? > >(that still leaves us microBSD and milliBSD :-) > > As I understand it picoBSD has never managed the 4.x->5.x transition > and is scheduled to be removed if nobody starts paying attention > to it soon. I may be looking at it soon as it still produces a smaller system than 'nanoBSD' and works well for systems with old 8MB flash. I've been using the 4.x version and may need a 5.x version 'soon'. > > re@/scottl@ asked me to not put nanobsd in src/release as they would > prefer it be kept for the "official release" stuff only, and to > me src/tools actually makes a lot more sense after all. hmmm then I guess picoBSD could probably move too. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0403111213470.87340-100000>