Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:03:28 -0500 (EST)
From:      Wesley Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org>
To:        leafy <leafy@leafy.idv.tw>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions
Message-ID:  <20030211210240.M91727@volatile.chemikals.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030212013800.GA68983@leafy.idv.tw>
References:  <20030210204245.E86987@volatile.chemikals.org> <20030211021458.GA18597@leafy.idv.tw> <20030211221139.GA8670@hellraiser.andersa.net> <20030212013800.GA68983@leafy.idv.tw>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, leafy wrote:

> >
> > Anders
> Yes I noticed it this morning too.
> The funny thing is that. If you use a non-P4 optmized GCC to compile lcms with P4 opt, then it passes the test. But with a P4 opted GCC, it borks. Looks like P4 opted GCC itself is bogus.

That's odd. Does the FreeBSD build skill the stage2 compiler "rebuild"? I
thought the gcc build process tested itself against itself.

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030211210240.M91727>