Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:11:23 +0200
From:      Mark Huizer <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
To:        Doug Poland <doug@polands.org>, ListServer FreeBSD Questions <FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Routing without ipfw?
Message-ID:  <20001010191123.A15021@dohd.cx>
In-Reply-To: <NDBBKMNOJKJGAEKJNLIAOEGJELAA.doug@polands.org>; from doug@polands.org on Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 08:58:57AM -0500
References:  <39E24CC9.3BF9F219@i-clue.de> <NDBBKMNOJKJGAEKJNLIAOEGJELAA.doug@polands.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Thanks for the response.  I was attempting to get a 
> routing box working and I hadn't compiled firewall 
> options in the kernel yet.  Since my box wasn't 
> routing I wasn't sure of the relationship between
> natd and ipfw.  Unfortunately, I'm still not routing
> correctly.

That's a different question. Yes, you need ipfw for natd.
But ipfw is a loadable kernel module

Mark
> 
> > 
> > Doug Poland wrote:
> > > 
> > > Greetings all,
> > > 
> > > Can I route ip between interfaces ( ed0 --> ed1 ) without
> > > ipfw?
> > 
> > Yes. The simplest solution is to enable routing with /stand/sysinstall
> > during installation.
> > 
> > HTH
> > -Christoph Sold
> > 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

-- 
Nice testing in little China...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001010191123.A15021>