Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:17:16 -0400
From:      Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net>
To:        Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>
Cc:        Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Compose key and xterm vs. UTF-8
Message-ID:  <20100314131716.GA13942@saltmine.radix.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100314114524.GB25702@slackbox.erewhon.net>
References:  <hnh9td$ph3$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <20100314114524.GB25702@slackbox.erewhon.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:45:24PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:16:45AM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > Short:
> > ------
> > Why do compose key sequences fail to work in a UTF-8 xterm?
>=20
> The port x11/rxvt-unicode is lighter on resources then xterm, and works f=
ine
> with utf-8. (with LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8 and LC_ALL=3Den_US.UTF-8 set)

That doesn't appear to answer his question.

awai

--=20
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net

--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQFLnOHatIqByHxlDocRAr5nAKCWT4LrqcnDleHGCKVPGp4yScehbgCfcXug
kwpDzYz9L5KXVQlh1yf8OWQ=
=umIL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--DocE+STaALJfprDB--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100314131716.GA13942>