Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      21 Dec 2000 15:04:11 +0100
From:      Peter Mutsaers <peter@mutsaers.com>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT
Message-ID:  <87itod98h0.fsf@mutsaers.com>
In-Reply-To: babkin@bellatlantic.net's message of "21 Dec 2000 00:28:42 %2B0000"
References:  <5.0.0.25.1.20001220163018.01ada020_pop3.i4free.co.nz@ns.sol.net> <3A414EA2.46B51BEC_bellatlantic.net@ns.sol.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> "babkin" =3D=3D babkin  <babkin@bellatlantic.net> writes:

    babkin> Sorry for a stupid question but why would not they patent
    babkin> this protocol then ? For example, PostScript is patented
    babkin> by Adobe and the only reason everyone is able to use it is
    babkin> that Adobe had explicitly granted this right to the
    babkin> public.

I don't think this is possible worldwide. In Europe, software
patents do not exist and cannot be granted. There was an attempt to
change this lately, but (luckily) it failed for the time being. The
European Commision was convinced by open source advocates that
software patents are bad. At least it made them think twice and
postpone the process.

The only thing you can protect is the implementation (the program,
in this case to read/write the protocol) under copyright.

Thus 'anyone' could learn the protocol from looking at the driver
sourcecode and then implement a drop-in replacement for the card
hardware.

As others have said, given the rapid developments in the 3D graphics
world, that hardly seems practible though.

--=20
Peter Mutsaers  |  D=FCbendorf    | UNIX - Live free or die
plm@gmx.li      |  Switzerland  | Sent via FreeBSD 4.2-stable


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87itod98h0.fsf>