Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:08:34 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Wesley Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org> Cc: leafy <leafy@leafy.idv.tw>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions Message-ID: <20030212030834.GA85905@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030211210240.M91727@volatile.chemikals.org> References: <20030210204245.E86987@volatile.chemikals.org> <20030211021458.GA18597@leafy.idv.tw> <20030211221139.GA8670@hellraiser.andersa.net> <20030212013800.GA68983@leafy.idv.tw> <20030211210240.M91727@volatile.chemikals.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Wesley Morgan wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, leafy wrote: > > > > > > > Anders > > Yes I noticed it this morning too. > > The funny thing is that. If you use a non-P4 optmized GCC to compile lcms with P4 opt, then it passes the test. But with a P4 opted GCC, it borks. Looks like P4 opted GCC itself is bogus. > > That's odd. Does the FreeBSD build skill the stage2 compiler "rebuild"? I > thought the gcc build process tested itself against itself. > From personal observations, I would not use -march=p4 with gcc 3.2.x on my FreeBSD system. You're just asking for trouble. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030212030834.GA85905>