Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:36:44 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh Message-ID: <20031125023644.GA70472@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20031124.191931.67791612.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <16322.46449.554372.358751@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20031124.190904.127666948.imp@bsdimp.com> <16322.47726.903593.393976@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20031124.191931.67791612.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 07:19:31PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <16322.47726.903593.393976@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> > Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> writes: > : > : M. Warner Losh writes: > : > In message: <16322.46449.554372.358751@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> > : > Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> writes: > : > : I'll bet a larger percentage of our users build ports than need nss or > : > : ldap. > : > > : > I'll bet a larger percentage of the people are ignoring this thread > : > than reading it since it has been so devoid of concrete numbers. > : > : Aside from $SUBJECT.. > > I'm just saying that most of the developers I'm talking to on IRC say > this tread is insane, has no content and they are blowing it off > because of that. A concrete, real benchmark will go a long way > towards changing that. Until then, you are as good as kill filed. What qualifies as a "concrete, real benchmark"? I take it you don't think Drew's qualifies. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031125023644.GA70472>