Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:20:05 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" <illoai@gmail.com> To: "Predrag Punosevac" <punosevac@math.arizona.edu> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Michael S <msherman77@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Gnome & FreeBSD I forgot Message-ID: <d7195cff0708210020s6baf5125o89f82ded02a4d43c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46C92339.5080306@math.arizona.edu> References: <545941.20720.qm@web88311.mail.re4.yahoo.com> <46C8F173.8050700@math.arizona.edu> <46C92339.5080306@math.arizona.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20/08/07, Predrag Punosevac <punosevac@math.arizona.edu> wrote: > I forgot to say in my last massage. The good compromise between Gnome > (KDE) full blown desktop and ***Box X window managers is > Xfce. Xfce is only about 15Mb vs Gnome(KDE)~200Mb. ~> ls -ls /usr/local/bin/evilwm 28 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 28088 May 29 04:36 /usr/local/bin/evilwm Very fast, very responsive, and the "desktop" (being essentially what you put into ~/.xinitrc) is extremely configurable, although, to be fair, if you leave it running for a couple of weeks it might eat up 6 or 7 seconds of CPU time. I suppose a post-script would be that it could not possibly be called a compromise and likely won't be called good by very many. -- --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d7195cff0708210020s6baf5125o89f82ded02a4d43c>