Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:46:50 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: vim-script ports
Message-ID:  <20070916024650.GC661@dragon.NUXI.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070914170057.GD40615@amilo.cenkes.org>
References:  <cb5206420610172329k1202b2eas651efc3d96c4fb4b@mail.gmail.com> <20070914170057.GD40615@amilo.cenkes.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:00:58PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:29:05AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > Any particular reason for no vim scripts in ports?
> > I'm gonna make some, if there's no secret taboo.
> 
> Better late than never :-) For the past two days I've been
> playing with some vim scripts. Here's a pre-alpha version of

It all cool with me. :-)

Vi[m] rules!!
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon?
Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070916024650.GC661>