Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:28:53 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org, Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ifconfig_IF_aliasX regression Message-ID: <4AC45A35.1070901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20091001091513.11182ihiv60y2qyo@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <20090930135327.83446wivezjxxlc8@webmail.leidinger.net> <4AC36719.3010607@FreeBSD.org> <20091001091513.11182ihiv60y2qyo@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger ha scritto: >> The change is recent, to unificate ipv4 and ipv6 rc code. We have >> ipv4_addrs_IF that uses the former syntax, but why not ipv6_addrs_IF, >> too? > > Is this a question to me? Of course, no :-) > I already expected that this is some regression because of the IPv6 > changes, but still: intended or not? If yes -> missing UPDATING entry. CCed hrs@ for this regression and brooks@ for the ipv4_addrs_IF change. -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AC45A35.1070901>