Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Apr 2014 20:52:34 -0700
From:      Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>
To:        Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: XMMS options and plugins
Message-ID:  <CAN6yY1sJYSdF9DNLWs8U56a7fEt5cfwrpipromvkLwsxtwGeUw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <slrnlkbcer.1bbk.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
References:  <slrnlkbcer.1bbk.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>wrote:

> While I have reverted the knee-jerk deprecation and expiration of
> the remaining XMMS plugin ports, I *do* think that a lot of these
> are likely cruft and could go away.  So don't rely on me to keep
> all plugins alive.
>
> I've also been pointed to a swath of plugins that have already been
> removed on March 23 with r348843.  Looking over that list, I don't
> see anything that I might want to bring back, with the possible
> exception of xmms-faad.
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=348843
>
> Finally, who uses XMMS's RUSXMMS_PATCHES option?  These patches are
> very intrusive and getting rid of them would simplify the port.
>
> --
> Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de


Yes, please keep xmms-faad alive.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1sJYSdF9DNLWs8U56a7fEt5cfwrpipromvkLwsxtwGeUw>