Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:33:52 -0500
From:      Martin Jackson <mhjacks@swbell.net>
To:        Martin Jackson <mhjacks@swbell.net>
Cc:        yraffah@savola.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: portsnap mirror servers
Message-ID:  <444A22B0.3050502@swbell.net>
In-Reply-To: <444A2120.7090508@swbell.net>
References:  <3aaaa3a0604171743y33af6355udf750eca65605920@mail.gmail.com>	<44456BC2.1050102@freebsd.org>	<200604211440.28535.benlutz@datacomm.ch>	<1145629460.3188.27.camel@dell8600.dlib.vt.edu>	<44491437.8040306@freebsd.org>	<1145707287.44061.4.camel@redevil.savola.com> <444A2120.7090508@swbell.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I'm using 6.1-RC built on Apr 18 but that problem was there even on
>> 6.0-RELEASE
> 
> Are you using an HTTP proxy?  The pre-6.1 series portsnap did not play 
> nicely with HTTP proxies.  There were some patches committed in March or 
> so to address PR's on the subject.  I haven't had an opportunity to test 
> the changes in my work environment (which requires HTTP proxy use) yet, 
> but they look promising.

Yech, sorry.  What I meant to say was that portsnap didn't play nicely 
with proxies *requiring authentication*.  The patches should address 
that, though I haven't tried them personally.

The way to specify auth information should be:

            HTTP_PROXY=http://proxy.example.com:8080
            HTTP_PROXY_AUTH=basic:*:<user>:<pwd>

(from man 3 fetch).

Thanks,
Marty



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?444A22B0.3050502>