Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:04:00 -0700 From: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Jack F Vogel <jfv@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r209609 - head/sys/dev/ixgbe Message-ID: <AANLkTikBzIGwU33an8S6SaoIFlNfLgmysakf1LcIpeyz@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201006301739.18212.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201006301628.o5UGSS3B098954@svn.freebsd.org> <201006301739.18212.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It wont work as a delta, I figured just putting the new delta over it was ok, but if you think it should be reverted then by all means... Jack On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:39 PM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 30 June 2010 12:28:28 pm Jack F Vogel wrote: > > Author: jfv > > Date: Wed Jun 30 16:28:28 2010 > > New Revision: 209609 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209609 > > > > Log: > > Left out header change in last delta - new member > > in adapter so that advertise changes can be done > > to one port without the other changing. > > Should 209607 be reverted now? > > -- > John Baldwin >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikBzIGwU33an8S6SaoIFlNfLgmysakf1LcIpeyz>