Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 07:56:04 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interrupts in interrupt routines Message-ID: <19970910075604.SS25473@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199709100419.GAA20837@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>; from Luigi Rizzo on Sep 10, 1997 06:19:15 %2B0200 References: <19970909225801.RL53370@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199709100419.GAA20837@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > The system automati- > > cally arranges for interrupts in the xxx group to be called at > > a priority >= splxxx (). > > does the >= make any sense since there is no ordering, just masks ? Read the ``>='' as ``is or does include this priority group''. There are some priority groups that are really inclusive, like splhigh. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970910075604.SS25473>