Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:44:29 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cleanup for cryptographic algorithms vs. compiler optimizations Message-ID: <86k4q33pk2.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20100612225216.GT87112@cicely7.cicely.de> (Bernd Walter's message of "Sun, 13 Jun 2010 00:52:16 %2B0200") References: <20100611162118.GR39829@acme.spoerlein.net> <867hm5tl6u.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100612153526.GA3632@acme.spoerlein.net> <20100612163208.GS87112@cicely7.cicely.de> <864oh86tnl.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100612225216.GT87112@cicely7.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de> writes: > Amazing - this is one of the things which can get nasty if you try some > kind of microtuning. Only if you break the rules. Bad code is always bad, even if it sometimes works by accident. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k4q33pk2.fsf>