Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 08:07:01 -0700 From: Alan Batie <batie@agora.rdrop.com> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: login classes Message-ID: <19970917080701.13204@agora.rdrop.com> In-Reply-To: <199709170823.BAA29135@hub.freebsd.org>; from owner-hackers-digest@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Sep 17, 1997 at 01:23:23AM -0700 References: <199709170823.BAA29135@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: David Nugent <davidn@labs.usn.blaze.net.au> > Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 17:45:27 +1100 > Subject: Re: login classes > > Samba I have no experience with whatsoever. Perhaps it is a special > case that needs some attention by whoever integrated it into > FreeBSD. > > Which *specific* limits are you running into problems with? In my case, it's the # of processes limit, and it's always with programs that change uids --- the issue is that when they change to my uid, they don't pick up my resource limits and what they had before was too limited for the new environment, and thus they're not allowed to fork. I'm inclined to believe that either they should pick up the new resource limits automatically, without having to call setusercontext(), or they should remain counted as the original user for the purposes of resource limit checking. I think the latter would be a lot harder to do, and I think the former is better, but arguments could be made either way. -- Alan Batie ______ It's not my fault! It's some guy batie@agora.rdrop.com \ / named "General Protection"! +1 503 452-0960 \ / --Ratbert PGP FP: DE 3C 29 17 C0 49 \/ 7A 27 40 A5 3C 37 4A DA 52 B9 It is my policy to avoid purchase of any products from companies which use unrequested email advertisements or telephone solicitation.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970917080701.13204>