Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:21:15 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, "Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen" <ncbp@bank-pedersen.dk>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Subject:   Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second part)
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103111319350.29879-100000@zeppo.feral.com>
In-Reply-To: <xzp1ys4hv3m.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> writes:
> > > Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> writes:
> > > > Hmm. Sounds to me more like an argument for requiring devfs if you
> > > > use vinum.
> > > Not until vinum works equally well with devfs as without it.
> > Har har har har har............
> 
> Please take your sarcasm and shove it. And get acquainted with the
> issue at hand before joining the discussion.

I am acquainted with this issue. I actually started it with the subject
above. I have been mostly reading the threads.

I think you owe me an apology.

-matt



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0103111319350.29879-100000>