Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:29:49 +0000 From: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> To: sos@freebsd.dk Cc: Jon Larssen <jonlarssen@hotmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is ATA partially broken in -STABLE? Message-ID: <200203221229.aa11240@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:33:16 %2B0100." <200203220933.g2M9XGT90073@freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200203220933.g2M9XGT90073@freebsd.dk>, Søren Schmidt writes: >Its a known problem, the old way of solving it was: Ok - is there a good reason for not using spl calls to block the interrupt until the tsleep(), or is it just an oversight? I guess maybe you are trying to avoid the delay associated with deferring the interrupt, but it must open up a number of races, especially if the ATA interrupt line is shared with something else. Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi? <200203221229.aa11240>