Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 12:30:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday Message-ID: <200004231930.MAA63599@apollo.backplane.com> References: <45851.956517875@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
: :In message <200004231922.MAA63538@apollo.backplane.com>, Matthew Dillon writes: : :> Core should consider reverting the special rules that were originally :> created with the expectation of major breakage in 5.x back to :> the set of rules we had for 3.x and 4.x. : :I have no idea what special rules you are talking about for 4.x/5.x. : :4.x-stable is a -stable tree and shall be treated as such. Really, then you have a short memory. Why don't we ask Jordan for a clarification. -Matt Matthew Dillon <dillon@backplane.com> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004231930.MAA63599>