Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:15:09 -0600
From:      Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To:        Arthur Barlow <arthurbarlow@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Packages vs Ports
Message-ID:  <6201873e0912230915j5ef1032m3b4a7b55d3c9f5da@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b9384ad40912230906j2926aeeak196325377cd00f19@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <b9384ad40912230906j2926aeeak196325377cd00f19@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Arthur Barlow <arthurbarlow@gmail.com>wrote:

> I've recently run into a new problem.  Pkg_version show that there is a new
> version of Firefox 3.5.  However, when I try to recompile it, I get an
> error
> that the system has run out of swap space, even though I allocated a 512M
> slice for a machine with 256M RAM.  Anyway, when I used to recompile
> Firefox
> it would take over 8 hours.  So I figured that I would just delete it and
> download the new compiled version in a package.  But, the package is still
> not updated yet, and it's been over a week.  How long does it usually take
> for packages to catch up to ports?
>
> P.S. I'm using FreeBSD 7.2 on an old Gateway Pentium III machine with a 40G
> harddrive.
>
>
Also as a temp work around you could create a file backed swap.  Even
slower, but it would work.  You sys isn't really a compiling machine though.

-- 
Adam Vande More



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6201873e0912230915j5ef1032m3b4a7b55d3c9f5da>