Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 08:28:11 +0200 From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Christopher Masto <chris@netmonger.net> Subject: Re: Seagate vs Quantum.. opinions? Message-ID: <19990826082811.18950@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <19990825225928.A24365@netmonger.net>; from Christopher Masto on Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 10:59:28PM -0400 References: <19990825225928.A24365@netmonger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Christopher Masto wrote: > I have a situation where I asked for Seagate Barracudas and was > shipped "QUANTUM ATLAS IV 9 WLS 0707" instead. Before I send them > back, I want to make sure I'd be making the right decision. I think this decision can't be wrong (to return the Quantums since they aren't what you asked for). I can remember Kenneth's repeated statements that Seagate and IBM are those who make the drives with the best SCSI firmware, and this also matches my own experience (with the notable exception of Seagate Medalist, which are -- sorry -- crap). All i've seen so far from Quantum tells me that they've got a, ahem, very special understanding of the SCSI standard, to put it mildly. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990826082811.18950>