Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:35:52 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf newvers.sh
Message-ID:  <20040422.133552.69023448.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040422192347.GA20346@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
References:  <200404221918.i3MJIaNQ092757@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040422192347.GA20346@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20040422192347.GA20346@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
            Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> writes:
: Strictly speaking this is not 4.10-STABLE, 4.10 has not been released
: yet.  But newvers.sh will say it's 4.10-STABLE.

Right.  That's what branches do.  They cause us to go forward with 4.x
after the branch.  In the past, we've bumped the version number right
after the branch.  Because you are running something > 4.10 release
(well, in most ways, there may be a couple of fixes that are in 4.10
release that aren't in releng_4 today, but that's a grey zone, because
it clearly isn't 4.10-BETA either, neither is it 4.9-STABLE.  this is
the least bad name).

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040422.133552.69023448.imp>