Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:09:26 -0500 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP : security/gnupg will be upgraded to 2.0.1 Message-ID: <453417EE-3CED-4BBA-86D5-DE88F92B6B91@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <7mr6v6ht57.wl%kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> References: <7mu003jdyg.wl%kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> <457DA05F.8010805@FreeBSD.org> <7mr6v6ht57.wl%kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail-2-891489776 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > Anyway, this way maybe old-porters thinking. I liked to use > "<category>/<portname>" directory name (without version number). > Using version number in ports directory is very exceptional event for > keeping old ports (like "emacs", "emacs19", "emacs20"). I thought > this is the way to indicate "what you should choose" for port users. That's how I think of it as well. --Apple-Mail-2-891489776--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?453417EE-3CED-4BBA-86D5-DE88F92B6B91>