Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Sep 1998 04:13:31 +0800
From:      Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
To:        sos@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        abial@nask.pl (Andrzej Bialecki), jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: DEVFS & SLICE? 
Message-ID:  <199809212013.EAA03044@spinner.netplex.com.au>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 Sep 1998 14:23:36 %2B0200." <199809211223.OAA23471@sos.freebsd.dk> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Soren Schmidt wrote:
> In reply to Andrzej Bialecki who wrote:
> > =

> > Soren, you said you used DEVFS without SLICE on regular basis. Tell m=
e
> > then, please, what for, because I can't see what (significant) added
> > functionality over standard /dev/* it offered...
> =

> It doesn't give me anything but an emptier looking /dev with only those=

> devices in it that I actually have :)

And most important of all, it doesn't have da1s1e, so having /home on
/dev/da1s1e causes fsck to fail unless /etc/rc opens /dev/[r]da1s1 first =

to cause the disklabel to be probed and the corresponding [a-h] names to =

appear.  Devfs is rather impaired without this and is the show-stopper =

reason why it's not (and cannot) be on by default.

The partition nodes only appear for the boot disk because there is a =

behind-the-scenes open of the device for mount root.  fsck requires some =

messy modifications to make it devfs-aware to make it work without the =

functionality (auto-probing) that SLICE provided.

Cheers,
-Peter



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809212013.EAA03044>