Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Feb 1999 12:56:15 -0500
From:      gkaplan <gkaplan@castle.net>
To:        Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>
Cc:        Mark Ovens <marko@uk.radan.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ppp -> browser
Message-ID:  <36C9B13F.1F88B0A2@castle.net>
References:  <199902112344.XAA08577@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I admit to ignorance and a little stupidity always helps ... but:
  in my latest attempt to connect
     1.) as root start ppp - the default paragraph of   /etc/ppp/ppp.conf   is invoked

     2.) enter   term    to ppp ON myname>
          response    deflink: Entering terminal mode on   /dev/cuaa4
     3.) enter   at                response      OK
     4.) enter   atdt4084422     response:

                     CONNECT 48000/ARQ/X2/LAPM/V42BIS
                     Intac access Corperation
                     login:     ( keyin of my user name )
                     Password:    ( keyin of my password )
                     PPP session from ( 199.,173.8.10)  to 199.173.8.58 beginning ...
~@#$#
                     PPP ON myname>
     5.) switch virtual terminal
     6.) enter telnet 198.6.114.2    response     login:
     7.) enter user name                 response     Password:
     8.) enter password787987987  response  the first level menu from my isp  somewhat
slow but a complete and valid menu.
     9.) select a menu entry              response       nothing.
   10.) I now recognize that the preference selection for terminal at my isp is vt100
and that  device vt0 line in my conf file is commented out.
          I guess that I have to rebuild the kernel with uncommented "device vt0 ...
"  , then set the environment variable TERM
to vt100 . Is this correct ? Is there anything else ?


Brian Somers wrote:

> Heh, it's hard to tell without the negotiation logs.  I'd take the
> text below with a grain of salt though....  at this point, IPCP won't
> have been negotiated, so a dynamic IP won't have been agreed.
> Therefore, I would guess that the message is correct but misleading.
>
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 07:14:01PM +0000, Brian Somers wrote:
> > > > The attached is the result of my last attempt to run lynx. It does show that
> > > > PPP went into packet transmission mode and then failed.
> > > >
> > >
> > > If you enable IPCP and LCP logging, you may get a more informative
> > > log.  Also, have a look at http://www.FreeBSD.org/FAQ/userppp.html.
> > >
> >
> > login: gkaplan                # name entered
> > Password:                     # password entered
> > PPP session from (199.173.8.65) to 0.0.0.0 beginning ppp ON myname>
> >                                 ^^^^^^^^^^
> > You beat me to a reply Brian (been having problems, trashed my
> > password file :-O ). What I was wondering is about the ``to 0.0.0.0''.
> >
> > Does this not mean that he's not got a local IP address?
> >
> > If he has a static address then it's not in ``set ifaddr'' or if
> > dynamic then the server hasn't assigned one?
> >
> > > --
> > > Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@FreeBSD.org> <brian@OpenBSD.org>
> > >       <http://www.Awfulhak.org>;
> > > Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >       FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org
> >       My Webpage http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~markov
> > _______________________________________________________________
> > Mark Ovens, CNC Apps Engineer, Radan Computational Ltd. Bath UK
> > CAD/CAM solutions for Sheetmetal Working Industry
> > mailto:marko@uk.radan.com                  http://www.radan.com
> >
> >




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36C9B13F.1F88B0A2>