Date: 15 Mar 2002 03:32:00 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS Issues with branch.. Was: Re: HEADS UP: Be nice to -CURRENT ( "1 week Feature Slush" ) Message-ID: <xzpwuwesgrj.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <200203150227.g2F2RIe27557@bmah.dyndns.org> References: <20020315004008.D022138CC@overcee.wemm.org> <200203150227.g2F2RIe27557@bmah.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > Differences of opinion on naming aside...the branch isn't supposed to > last long at all. The point is to provide a slightly polished snapshot > to the wider developer community. We can't do the QA/releng work on > HEAD without calling for a code freeze (which we early on decided that > we would *not* do). Then you don't need a branch, you just need a simple tag, and you can slide it forward if something needs fixing, and remove it after rolling and shipping the snapshot. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpwuwesgrj.fsf>