Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:20:05 -0500
From:      "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <zbeeble@gmail.com>
To:        "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: MFC ZFS: when?
Message-ID:  <5f67a8c40811211620x63ea3095m6817d9b9de2d2f9a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3a142e750811211609u67969c2fqe16a88aea52309fb@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <5f67a8c40811211558n5fc77a54v3d4589dc838af443@mail.gmail.com> <3a142e750811211609u67969c2fqe16a88aea52309fb@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul B. Mahol <onemda@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/22/08, Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In several of the recent ZFS posts, multiple people have asked when this
> > will be MFC'd to 7.x.  This query has been studiously ignored as other
> > chatter about whatever ZFS issue is discussed.
> >
> > So in a post with no other bug report or discussion content to distract
> us,
> > when is it intended that ZFS be MFC'd to 7.x?
>
> Once no new bugs appear any more, and old one are fixed.


That's a pretty cop-out answer.  Considering the the version of ZFS in 7.x
has significant issues and the ZFS patches havn't shown any propensity to
affect non-ZFS systems when ZFS is not running or loaded, the benefit of
importing the new code seems to outweigh any caution you might feel.  I can
understand an answer such as "not in 7.1, but immediately after" ... given
the standards we apply to release branches ... but a vague "when no bugs
seem to appear" applies much less to a system like ZFS (still in flux) than,
say, the new USB stack.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5f67a8c40811211620x63ea3095m6817d9b9de2d2f9a>