Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:53:15 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...? Message-ID: <20031001165315.4e509815.Alexander@Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20031001142258.GA37336@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20030930221148.54E7E5D07@ptavv.es.net> <20030930194544.H94686@ganymede.hub.org> <20031001010119.M592@korben.in.tern> <20030930232506.GA31027@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20031001131926.2a590638.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <20031001142258.GA37336@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:22:58 -0700
Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:19:26PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700
> > Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became available
> > > on UFS1. The only requirement is softupdates and softupdates pre-dates
> > > UFS2.
> >
> > Snapshots are available in 4.9? I thought it's not only about the FS
> > structure, it's about the code in -current (which is much different from
> > the 4.x code).
> >
>
> I wrote snapshots require softupdates. How you jumped
> to the conclusion that 4.x has snapshots is beyond me.
> My truck has a 4-speed manual transmission, therefore
> all trucks have 4-speed manual transmissions.
I've read a "committed ... to RELENG_4, snapshot" because I had the
impression we talked about RELENG_4.
Sorry,
Alexander.
--
Loose bits sink chips.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031001165315.4e509815.Alexander>