Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:35:34 -0400 From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com> To: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> Cc: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64bit ticks, was Re: Changing p_swtime and td_slptime to ticks Message-ID: <f34ca13c0709181835p32a39d01m986c03a506ac6aa3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46F05F88.5060809@errno.com> References: <20070917165657.B558@10.0.0.1> <46EF644E.9050207@elischer.org> <20070918012555.G558@10.0.0.1> <46EFE4BD.4030505@freebsd.org> <20070918142115.C558@10.0.0.1> <20070918153536.D558@10.0.0.1> <46F05F88.5060809@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18/09/2007, Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> wrote: > ticks is used a lot. I'd rather set hz back to 100 by default. This > approach is a perfect example of ignoring low-end platforms. Not only that, but it also consumes more power even on the fast platforms. Compare the idle power consumption of my Core 2 Duo Allendale box: kern.hz=100: 72W kern.hz=1000: 74W C.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f34ca13c0709181835p32a39d01m986c03a506ac6aa3>