Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:43:24 -0600
From:      Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
To:        Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: freebsd-update broken?
Message-ID:  <0914BF61B90385ED2EA5C47D@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1143796773.65237.8.camel@mayday.esat.net>
References:  <19B4FEF7616674F09DF8BF90@Paul-Schmehls-Computer.local> <1143796773.65237.8.camel@mayday.esat.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==========3E347D8B4D9BF5E2907E==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

--On Friday, March 31, 2006 10:19:33 +0100 Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org>=20
wrote:

> On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 20:09 -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> security/freebsd-update is supposed to work for amd64, however:
>>
>> freebsd-update fetch
>> Fetching public key...
>> fetch: http://update.daemonology.net/amd64/6.0/pub.key: Not Found
>> Error fetching updates
>>
>> There is not amd64 directory on the server.
>
> There's no support (at the moment) for !i386 archs.

Why is this in the Makefile then?

# The RSA code has been tested and works on these platforms.  On other
# platforms, it either doesn't work or hasn't been tested.
ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=3D i386 amd64 alpha sparc64

And shouldn't it refuse to install on a non-i386 box?

Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
--==========3E347D8B4D9BF5E2907E==========--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0914BF61B90385ED2EA5C47D>