Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 11:52:53 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com> Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, "xen-users@lists.xen.org" <xen-users@lists.xen.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing Message-ID: <CAHu1Y73xuFqAQL99rTJL0_LGFNsdafcDd0sTpyg9DYjAgmf_jQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <519131D8.9010307@citrix.com> References: <519131D8.9010307@citrix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Roger Pau Monn=E9 <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Recently Justin T Gibbs, Will Andrews and myself have been working on > improving the Xen support in FreeBSD. The main goal of this was to bring > full PVHVM support to FreeBSD, right now FreeBSD is only using PV > interfaces for disk and network interfaces when running as a HVM guest. .= .. I think should be encouraged. We're eagerly awaiting the ability to run FreeBSD in AWS in something other than t1.micro or cluster compute instances. Should we keep holding out hope, or will AWS make HVM available for all instance types before this happens? - M
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y73xuFqAQL99rTJL0_LGFNsdafcDd0sTpyg9DYjAgmf_jQ>