Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 30 Apr 2000 14:49:52 -0400
From:      Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>
To:        Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Greg Gilliss <greg@gilliss.com>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Suggestion
Message-ID:  <20000430144952.D27631@argon.blackdawn.com>
In-Reply-To: <vqcpur9qnnc.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from asami@FreeBSD.ORG on Sat, Apr 29, 2000 at 02:09:27AM -0700
References:  <200004281936.MAA28360@netpublishing.com> <vqcpur9qnnc.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 29, 2000 at 02:09:27AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> This is truly bizarre.  569 is my uid, and the owner of the files in
> the ports tree on the package building machine.
> 
> Jordan, any idea how this could happen?  bsd.port.mk gives the file to
> pkg_create with -r, just like all other files.  I don't understand why
> only +REQUIRE retains the ownership.

Look carefully:

>  * -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel      71 Apr 22 02:59 +COMMENT
>  * -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel     186 Apr 22 02:59 +CONTENTS
>  * -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel     151 Apr 22 02:59 +DESC
>  * -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel     102 Apr 22 02:59 +INSTALL
>  * -rw-r--r--  1 569   569       135 May 20  1999 +REQUIRE
>  * drwxr-xr-x  4 root  wheel     512 Apr 28 12:24 usr/

I don't know how it would make much difference, but REQUIRE also seems to
retain a different date, as opposed to the other files.

-- 
Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ 
G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000430144952.D27631>