Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:44:19 -0400 From: "Rohit Tripathi" <rohit.trip@gmail.com> To: "Andrew Reilly" <andrew-freebsd@areilly.bpc-users.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnome2/x11 slow after optimization! Message-ID: <33615c8e0808260844k6c3a4d7fvc4e2b7de51ef98b6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080826070633.GA85357@duncan.reilly.home> References: <33615c8e0808211038l7b9ab665l67f0439d3f40e6a6@mail.gmail.com> <20080826070633.GA85357@duncan.reilly.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:06 AM, Andrew Reilly <andrew-freebsd@areilly.bpc-users.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 01:38:09PM -0400, Rohit Tripathi wrote: >> CFLAGS= -O3 -pipe -mtune=core2 -m128bit-long-double -mfpmath=sse > > Just on top of what everyone else has said, (i.e., "don't do > that"), the -m128bit-long-double option is almost certainly > going to break something if you're operating in 32-bit mode (it > changes the ABI for some functions and struct alignment), with Yes, I read that before compiling and since I'm also running amd64, I recompiled everything from scratch! It was merely experimental, I'm back to the default install of 64bit stable, moving on to current.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33615c8e0808260844k6c3a4d7fvc4e2b7de51ef98b6>