Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:31:50 +0200
From:      Robert Klein <RoKlein@roklein.de>
To:        Sandro Tolaini <sandro@focuseek.com>, Release Engineers <re@FreeBSD.ORG>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, vendors@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        re@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Status of 4.6.1
Message-ID:  <200208011031.50355.RoKlein@roklein.de>
In-Reply-To: <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com>
References:  <XFMail.20020731162333.re@FreeBSD.org> <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Risking to put my foot into my mouth:

> Just a question about ports: I saw that the ports tree has the matching tag
> for 4.6.1 release at the same revisions of 4.6 (that is, ports bundled with
> 4.6.1 release CDs will be the same packaged with 4.6). I think that ports
> bundled with 4.6.2 should be more recent.

As far as I know, the Release Candidates used the ports for 4.6
(after all, they're release _candidates_).  I remember having
read somewhere (qa-freebsd list?), a package built of the current
ports was being scheduled --- at a time, when 4.6.1 still was
scheduled.

Especially in the light, of some ports being statically linked
against now fixed libraries etc. I think you can trust re@ to
meet the decision you desire.

Regards,
Robert



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-vendors" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208011031.50355.RoKlein>