Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 07 Oct 1997 08:20:03 -0400
From:      Joshua Fielden <shaggy@houseofduck.ml.org>
To:        Shawn Ramsey <shawn@luke.cpl.net>
Cc:        Kris Kirby <kirbykb@airnet.net>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Good nameserver system?
Message-ID:  <343A28F3.ECFD5F1A@houseofduck.ml.org>
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.95.971007220512.1317A-100000@luke.cpl.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Shawn Ramsey wrote:
> 
> > What would be a good system for making a nameserver? I'm guessing P-200 or
> > better and PPro-200. This would be a FreeBSD system, running named or a
> > faster nameserver. And a 500M-2GB disk cache.
> 
> A P133 with 64MB on RAM should be able to handle just about any namesever
> you could throw at it. Nameserving is not at all CPU intensive.

Currently, the New York office here at GeoCities is using a P120 laptop
with 16 megs of RAM for DNS/ftp/www, and working just fine. :-)
-- 
This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System.  If this had been an
actual life-threatening emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you
would not have been informed.
	 -- Joshua Fielden, Systems Administrator, GeoCities
	http://www.geocities.com	jfielden@geocities.com
I do not speak for my company, all opinions enclosed in this e-mail are
purely my own.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?343A28F3.ECFD5F1A>