Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:50:19 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Paul Procacci <pprocacci@datapipe.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NanoBSD :: smallest image size Message-ID: <20090219164957.G46777@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <499D7F0B.7000307@datapipe.com> References: <499D67B6.60309@datapipe.com> <20090219161505.X46627@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <499D7F0B.7000307@datapipe.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Yeah, I realize it's more powerful than necessary to handle the task...though > my current firewall/router is a 860+ Mhz PIII w/ 128 Megs of ram. So, this > would be a downgrade for my current firewall/router which allows me to > repurpose the existing machine for something more computationally expensive. so - downgrade. FreeBSD easily runs (full, not stripped) on 32MB RAM
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090219164957.G46777>