Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:56:29 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removal of Portmanager Message-ID: <50F3C83D.7070209@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <50F3C527.9070700@passap.ru> References: <20130112120748.61c8e103@gumby.homeunix.com> <50F187DC.2070804@FreeBSD.org> <20130113160213.6f10a863@gumby.homeunix.com> <CADLo839SnMTf7dj8zSbRTJz4gVYp_LfhP7ZNw8ywCpe5yLwXBQ@mail.gmail.com> <50F3C527.9070700@passap.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14/01/2013 08:43, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 13.01.2013 20:22, Chris Rees пишет: > >> Pkgng is also part of the ports tree nowadays, and portmanager must support >> it. The old pkg_install suite will be removed soon. Portmanager needs fixing! > > That threaten me a bit. Will pkg_install be removed soon from all > supported versions? > pkg_tools are going to be around for at least the duration of 8.3-RELEASE which comes out of support some time in April 2014 -- see the road map here: https://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng/CharterAndRoadMap#Road_Map However the plan is that pkgng should become the default packaging system for all releases from now on. It's already the default in 10.x, and at some point relatively soon it should become the default in stable/8 and stable/9. (Delayed because of the current lack of package building systems, inter-alia) All this means is that you will have to put stuff in /etc/make.conf in order to use pkg_tools, rather than the situation now, where you have to put stuff in /etc/make.conf in order to use pkgng. Cheers, Matthew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50F3C83D.7070209>