Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 15:15:14 +0930 From: Leigh Hart <hart@dotat.com> To: Mohit Aron <aron@cs.rice.edu> Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman), freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, alc@cs.rice.edu (Alan Cox) Subject: Re: arp errors on machines with two interfaces Message-ID: <199910090545.PAA20008@at.dotat.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Oct 1999 23:16:12 EST." <199910090416.XAA01282@cs.rice.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Mohit, Mohit Aron <aron@cs.rice.edu> wrote: > > > Yes, don't put two network interfaces on one (logical) wire. > > Brilliant! All machines in our dept are connected by switched > 100Mbps Ethernet - so your suggestion implies that I either > don't put two network interfaces on the machine or don't > connect both to the network. > > The first would mean I cannot saturate the machine anymore in > my experiments, and I'll leave the second to more imaginative > minds than mine. If you require more than 100Mbps of aggregate bandwidth to the network, use FastEtherchannel or use two different (logical) subnets via two different VLANs on your switch. Cheers Leigh -- | "By the time they had diminished | Leigh Hart, hart@dotat.com | | from 50 to 8, the other dwarves | CCNA: http://www.cisco.com | | began to suspect 'Hungry' ..." | PO Box 3057 Newton SA 5074 | | -- Gary Larson, "The Far Side" | http://www.dotat.com/hart/ | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199910090545.PAA20008>