Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:18:10 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lapic@2k interrukts eating CPU cycles Message-ID: <86fyva7cod.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20050622130659.GF63959@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au> (Alex Wilkinson's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:37:00 %2B0930") References: <200506091423.39940@harrymail> <200506211539.26772.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200506220122.24315@harrymail> <86slza27md.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050622130659.GF63959@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Wilkinson, Alex" <alex.wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au> writes: > Why do we need both LAPIC *and* an IO-APIC ? Because they serve different purposes. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fyva7cod.fsf>