Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:29:47 -0700 From: Rumen Telbizov <telbizov@gmail.com> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, brian@freebsd.org, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru> Subject: Re: 10.1-BETA2 possible kernel memory leak in routing table Message-ID: <CAENR%2B_VWUgAbSc%2B4VpKkXh9Xwo5kSb5oGYLpT8vw89c344aL8Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5440284A.2020301@sentex.net> References: <CAENR%2B_UVLDDrsef2W4CXCFX65EYaxeKN4MNWbgoyaZ5qDGe1Pg@mail.gmail.com> <542AAA3C.1080803@ipfw.ru> <CAENR%2B_X5KTdeb00f9NShN1YK%2BT2aY1vG5YcTCgu4aXZO=%2Bpa=g@mail.gmail.com> <542AE376.6000003@FreeBSD.org> <CAENR%2B_XX4jnD6SBi8S1dGfWM68tmcm0aE2iMVA3LDR3R8ygQYw@mail.gmail.com> <542AFAE3.9030705@FreeBSD.org> <CAENR%2B_WbntqjE4b=iZS8z30AK7gSpur00HsWP9-T_UJ7OosU8Q@mail.gmail.com> <20141001135124.GM73266@glebius.int.ru> <542C20D7.3070606@sentex.net> <20141001171646.GQ73266@glebius.int.ru> <CAENR%2B_VwWor23sX4WAfzU18z8mdRxGverUsCKcjO=L3DVSuq6g@mail.gmail.com> <542C5529.9030800@FreeBSD.org> <7AB35136-89AA-48F2-8B0E-1BA3DCD4A6BA@ipfw.ru> <CAENR%2B_Xv4iPAaOd3Vj%2BFQAZLu4%2BH3N1Rp6pd_b9UUSUu-a3j6A@mail.gmail.com> <CAENR%2B_XX=brNVRBOL-jeWPGSLpWZF9Gddso2FPJn5LKP3zG%2B%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <5440284A.2020301@sentex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As far as I know they have not. I needed to apply them manually after svn up to the latest 10 stable. It would be great if they become part of 10.1-RELEASE. I have been running with them for 2 weeks now both my firewalls and everything has been rock solid. On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> wrote: > Hi, > Have these two patches been merged to RELENG_10 ? > > ---Mike > > On 10/2/2014 6:25 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> Alexander, Gleb: good news guys. The problem seems to be resolved! Good >> job.Here's what I have. >> >> 1. I upgraded the backup firewall to 10-STABLE (r272435), applied Gleb's >> patch of pf_table.c and rebuilt. Just as reported by Gleb, the leak seemed >> to be reduced but it was still present and leaked a little bit of memory >> upon every PF reload. >> >> 2. In addition to 1) I applied the second patch from Alexander on radix.c >> and rebuilt the kernel. After the reboot it seems like the amount of >> memory >> consumed by the routetbl grows a little bit temporarily after reload and >> then drops back to the previous, stable amount shortly after. >> >> Gleb, Alexander, thank you very much for your help. I appreciate your >> quick >> response in providing patches for this problem. I hope those 2 patches get >> tested by more people and get MFC'ed into 10-STABLE soon. >> > > > -- > ------------------- > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net > Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net > Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ > -- Rumen Telbizov Unix Systems Administrator <http://telbizov.com>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAENR%2B_VWUgAbSc%2B4VpKkXh9Xwo5kSb5oGYLpT8vw89c344aL8Q>