Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      21 Jan 2001 23:28:26 +0100
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        "Giovanni P. Tirloni" <tirloni@techie.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Securelevel idea
Message-ID:  <xzp66j8czg5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: "Giovanni P. Tirloni"'s message of "Sun, 21 Jan 2001 17:52:29 -0200 (BRST)"
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101211743380.564-100000@mink01.tirloni.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Giovanni P. Tirloni" <tirloni@techie.com> writes:
>  I was thinking about securelevels this afternoon and my brain came up
>  with an idea: what about if we could set fine-grained securelevels? Like,
>  each securelevel could have its own set of prohibitons and that could
>  only be changed setting some option in the kernel and compiling a new
>  one.

Congratulations, you just invented capabilities! :)

http://www.trustedbsd.org/

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp66j8czg5.fsf>