Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 15:10:26 -0400 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: Conrad Sabatier <conrads@home.com> Cc: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/18357: Xswallow port, final version (promise!) :-) Message-ID: <20000514151025.M82488@argon.blackdawn.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.000511071605.conrads@home.com>; from conrads@home.com on Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:16:05AM -0500 References: <20000512073120.A804@argon.blackdawn.com> <XFMail.000511071605.conrads@home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:16:05AM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > :-) I was hesitant to even mention that, for fear it might be > misinterpreted. What I was thinking was that maybe there was another port > that had already filled the purpose of this one, and so it was considered > unnecessary or redundant. Either that, or perhaps, given the occasionally > flakey e-mail service on @Home, that someone had written me about it and I > hadn't gotten their message, so it was assumed that I had lost interest or > wouldn't be a reliable maintainer. My friend, perhaps you haven't perused the ports collection enough yet. Redundancy is what it's all about.. <mutter> i'd prefer the adjective "choices, choices" </mutter> > I wasn't taking it personally. :-) Oh, good. Many people have the habit of doing that. ;-) > Whoa! Heh, that number will jump (i do mean saliently) in coming weeks... > > Anyway, I had some interest in your port when you submitted it, but at > > this time I have a 2.5hr physics senior final to take that starts in > > about 30 minutes. Other people probably have similar excuses these days. > > Fair enough. I wouldn't have even asked about it this soon, but it looked > like other port submissions were just zipping through, so I was wondering > if there was a problem. Heck, that physics exam was easy; just a bunch of E&M questions relating to Faraday's law, Gauss's law, Ampere's law, and Ohm's law. What other port submissions? As near as I can tell, the new port submissions have been piling up fast in the last 2-3 weeks. ;-) Geez, we'll have 4,000 in no time, maybe even before 4.2-RELEASE. And to think there were less than 1,500 when I first started using FreeBSD... methinks Satoshi needs to regen that "ports collection growth" graph... -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000514151025.M82488>