Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:06:30 +0200 From: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lapic@2k interrukts eating CPU cycles Message-ID: <200506221606.42862@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <42B96E66.4040503@samsco.org> References: <200506091423.39940@harrymail> <200506221554.41750@harrymail> <42B96E66.4040503@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1230827.6mcHpyKOWG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2005 15:57 schrieb Scott Long: [...] > > I've never seen before I > > upgraded to -current (short before the code freeze to help finding > > bugs) > > Because you have 'options APIC' in your kernel, and your running a post > 5.2 version of FreeBSD that has a massively improved interrupt routing > system in it. I've been running 5-current on that machine with "options APIC" for a long= =20 time, back to when I had to include NO-MIXEDMODE to get it working until I= =20 think Robeert Watson gave me some patches. But I never had lapic so I was wondering... > > And what does the "ti" mean? ( from systat "2030 lapic0: ti" ) > > Short for 'timer' Thanks a lot, =2DHarry > > Scott --nextPart1230827.6mcHpyKOWG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCuXByBylq0S4AzzwRAieVAJ962da8xqMK5CvJ/wQplX8mpTY5WgCgii1g Yj/o8IO2XsC/cy25EMsokM0= =vpwo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1230827.6mcHpyKOWG--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506221606.42862>