Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Feb 1998 08:33:23 -0800
From:      Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
To:        Chris Timmons <skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, Atipa <freebsd@atipa.com>
Subject:   Re: Dual PII and environmental monitoring
Message-ID:  <34F2F653.73A827AD@feral.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980222084950.11485C-100000@opus.cts.cwu.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--------------319149932D67F6907E349010
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I dunno about mainboard monitoring, but I have some uncommitted
changes to put into Justin's CAM tree that will do SCSI based
environmental monitoring (SES && SAF-TE- used in a lot of new
disk arrays). I've been mulling over ways to try and integrate SCSI 
environmental with mainboard stuff, but not very deeply.

I suspect that because the enviro and power stuff shows up in a lot
of different places it will just have to be up to a userland
app/lib/api-set to sort out what's what.

--------------319149932D67F6907E349010
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

X-POP3-Rcpt: mjacob@feral-gw
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: from sarip.sol.net (mail@sarip.sol.net [169.207.30.120])
	by feral.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id JAA01834
	for <mjacob@feral.com>; Sun, 22 Feb 1998 09:36:03 -0800
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.18])
	by sarip.sol.net (8.8.8/8.8.8/SNNS-1.02) with ESMTP id LAA01818;
	Sun, 22 Feb 1998 11:34:22 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA14601;
          Sun, 22 Feb 1998 09:33:50 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware)
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (bulk_mailer v1.6); Sun, 22 Feb 1998 09:33:37 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA14554
          for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Sun, 22 Feb 1998 09:33:36 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from opus.cts.cwu.edu (skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu [198.104.92.71])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA14500
          for <freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org>; Sun, 22 Feb 1998 09:33:27 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu)
Received: from localhost (skynyrd@localhost)
	by opus.cts.cwu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA13544;
	Sun, 22 Feb 1998 09:33:26 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 09:33:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris Timmons <skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu>
To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: Atipa <freebsd@atipa.com>
Subject: Dual PII and environmental monitoring
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980222084950.11485C-100000@opus.cts.cwu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


I've been researching dual PII boards and have arrived at a quandry about
environmental monitoring.  Ideally I would like to be able to remotely
query server machines to check for fan failures and overheating.  At home
where I have 7200rpm disks, no air conditioning and summer temperatures
that often approach 40C, operating temperatures are a concern.

Tyan and ASUS use the National Semiconductor LM78 for monitoring internal
temperature, fan speed, etc.  There is Linux support for reading this
information and an ostensibly complete data sheet available from national
at http://www.national.com/ds/LM/LM78.pdf.  Likewise, the Intel DK440LX
uses the LM79 - data sheet also available.

Gigabyte has their own ACOPS technology which they claim is "supported" by
all operating systems in that (the bios?) can sense (purportedly more
reliably than LM78 based systems) CPU overheating conditions and "auto
speed down" the system.  Also, the chassis speaker sounds an audible
alarm.  http://www.giga-byte.com/RACOPS2.html

Gigabyte MB's are cost effective and have a good reputation from people on
this list; however, it would appear that contrary to their marketing
rhetoric ACOPS is a closed-door solution that is a win only for MS$ users
who can realize the unmitigatably overwhelming benefits of Gigabyte's
bundled patented SIV application. 

Comments?  Technical references from Gigabyte to match National's open,
pro free software approach?  I can't find them.

-Chris


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message


--------------319149932D67F6907E349010--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34F2F653.73A827AD>