Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:44:04 +0200
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS 
Message-ID:  <41449.1092750244@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:27:40 %2B0200." <20040817132740.GA32139@freebie.xs4all.nl> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20040817132740.GA32139@freebie.xs4all.nl>, Wilko Bulte writes:

>RAID-3 IIRC uses a dedicated parity disk, and small stripes.  I don't think
>it must be bytelevel striping.  Just small enough stripes that all disks
>contribute to every I/O

RAID3 differs from RAID5 in that you always access the entire stripe
and never have R/M/W cycles.

Typically the problem is that by doing so you get a RAID3 sectorsize
which is the sum of all non-parity sectors, a 4+1 will give you
4 x 512 = 2048 and 8 + 3 will give you 4k.

Since a lot of filesystems/OS/hardware can only work with 512 byte
sectors, people have hacked around this in various ways and eventually
given up on RAID3.

UFS/FFS works fine with 1k, 2k, 4k and larger sectorsizes and so
RAID3 is a great idea for FreeBSD, and I'd rather use RAID3 than
RAID5 myself.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41449.1092750244>