Date: 01 Feb 2002 17:49:31 -0500 From: Randell Jesup <rjesup@wgate.com> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HOW to debug memory corruption efficiently? Message-ID: <0000aff705b39407d2@[192.168.1.4]>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Darryl Okahata <darrylo@soco.agilent.com> writes:
> Purify's nearest (commercial) competitor is ParaSoft's "Insure++".
>Perhaps things have improved but, when we last evaluated it a year or
>two back, it was a LOT slower than purify (unusably slow for our
>applications). I seem to recall 5-10X slower than purify (maybe more).
>It can detect a few problems that purify does not, however (e.g., bad
>arguments to printf()). Insure++ needs access to source code for best
>results. I believe a Linux version is available.
>
> There is no open-source equivalent to purify (and probably won't
>be, due to patent issues). The closest thing is "GNU checker", but
>that's a pale, feeble dust speck compared to purify (assuming that you
>even manage to get checker working).
I'd also give the latest version of dmalloc a try. It also works
fairly well, and includes protecting freed memory blocks to catch
free-memory reads (I think) and writes.
C++ may need minor source mods to track source file/lines for
new'd objects. Overall it works pretty well. See ports and also
dmalloc.com.
--
Randell Jesup, Worldgate Communications, ex-Scala, ex-Amiga OS team
rjesup@wgate.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safet=
y
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0000aff705b39407d2>