Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:57:30 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?R2VyZ2VseSBTw6FudGE=?= <Gergely_Santa@tempest.sk> To: infofarmer@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: configure editors/vim Message-ID: <46EA3EEA.9090005@tempest.sk> In-Reply-To: <20070914065841.GA4831@amilo.cenkes.org> References: <46E92692.7020202@tempest.sk> <20070914065841.GA4831@amilo.cenkes.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:01:22PM +0200, Gergely Sánta wrote: >> Hi! >> I'm a developer using gvim with it's tagging through exctags (somehow ctags >> never worked for me). As vim port have no configuration options, it can't >> be configured easyly through 'make config'. I'm too lazy for digging >> Makefile for options every time I compile new version of vim, I added >> configuration options to Makefile. >> I'm new to FreeBSD, also to it's Ports, so maybe I don't see the reasons, >> these options aren't in the Makefile, but maybe they should be there. >> Anyway, I attach my change, maybe it will be acceptable to have it's way to >> ports. And if not, maybe it will help for someone else too :) > > It's interesting to hear that from a vim (power?) user :) > Personally I resent dialog(1) because it's so much faster, more > hassle-free and convenient to edit make.conf(5) with vim. As I mentioned in my post, I'm new to FreeBSD, I didn't know (yet) about make.conf... Anyway thanx for the help (also thanx for Martin Tournoij, he gave me stricter hint)! EdE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46EA3EEA.9090005>