Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 08:38:30 +0200 From: sebastian ssmoller <sebastian.ssmoller@gmx.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: powerd(8) Message-ID: <20050421083830.726cf741.sebastian.ssmoller@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <d46shg$rou$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <4263A33A.3030201@centtech.com> <2304.1113826754@critter.freebsd.dk> <20050418140117.GH2298@poupinou.org> <4263C6C5.300@centtech.com> <d46shg$rou$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > But in general, it looks that a main problem with original adaptive > algorithm is that it is possible to decrease an effective cpu > frequency to an incredibly small values (for mine centrino it can go > from 1.3Ghz down to 75Mhz), where even the easiest things take a lot > of time, so it is forced to increase it. It looks that just limiting > the minimal frequency by a something like 200-300 Mhz should make the > original adaptive algorithm work much better. > agree! estctrl decreased speed only down to 600MHz which worked perfectly for me ... guess even 200MHz would be a bit to slow still .. seb -- "Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." --- Antoine de St. Exupery, Wind, Sand, and Stars, 1939
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050421083830.726cf741.sebastian.ssmoller>