Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:48:30 -0700 From: "DOROVSKOY,IGOR (A-Portsmouth,ex1)" <igor_dorovskoy@agilent.com> To: 'Giorgos Keramidas' <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, Storms of Perfection <gary@outloud.org> Cc: replicator@ngs.ru, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Clock Granularity (kernel option HZ) Message-ID: <0D9185CE635BD511ACA50090277A6FCF1359B4@axcs18.cos.agilent.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've made HZ=100000 and ran few very simple tests (icmp, udp) thrue gbe interface (3C985B-SX and GA620) against same system with HZ=100. To transmit - no big difference. For recieve side "overclocked" system bet regular in times. In my case wasn't big difference to bing localhost and overclocked system thrue bge nic! Systat shows empty mbufs all the time. I want to run some better perfomance tests for tcp tomorrow. Igor. p.s. guys, x-windows moves so smoothly on overclocked box ... :-) -----Original Message----- From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto:keramida@ceid.upatras.gr] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 4:36 PM To: Storms of Perfection Cc: replicator@ngs.ru; hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clock Granularity (kernel option HZ) I've been running for quite some time a 5.0-CURRENT box with HZ=1000 set to it's kernel configuration. Apart from a faster blinking rate of the syscons cursor, I haven't seen much difference. This is my own personal workstation though, and it's almost never loaded too much :-/ - Giorgos On 2002-01-31 14:22, Storms of Perfection wrote: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0D9185CE635BD511ACA50090277A6FCF1359B4>