Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Feb 2003 15:44:23 -0500 (EST)
From:      Andriy Gapon <agapon@cv-nj.com>
To:        Mike Durian <durian@boogie.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, Guido van Rooij <guido@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: ipsec & ipfw: 4.7-release vs -stable
Message-ID:  <20030213154234.P65520@edge.foundation.invalid>
In-Reply-To: <200302101137.45763.durian@boogie.com>
References:  <20030210114109.G53494@edge.foundation.invalid> <200302101137.45763.durian@boogie.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Mike Durian wrote:

> once in their decrypted form.  So, despite the comment in the commit
> message:
>
> 	Get rid of checking for ip sec history.  It is true that
> 	packets are not supposed to be checked by the firewall rules
> 	twice. However, because the various ipsec handlers never
> 	call ip_input(), this never happens anyway.
>
> It looks like ipsec must be calling ip_input() somewhere.
>
> I too would like to see ipfilter behave as documented (in -current too)
> and not re-process decrypted ESP packets.  Perhaps change 1.214 can
> be reworked or reverted?  I'll file a PR.

Mike, filing a PR is an excellent idea. I think that should have been from
the start.
Thank you.

-- 
Andriy Gapon
*
"In my view XML is to data representation what Roman numerals are to math."
(c) Bakul Shah

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030213154234.P65520>